Bloom Alternatives in 2026 — Other Solana Trading Bots to Try

Bloom is one of the more polished Solana trading bots around. It is fast, the interface is clean, and it covers the features most active traders actually use: sniping new launches, limit orders, take-profit and stop-loss automation, copy trading, and an AFK mode that keeps strategies running while you are away. For a lot of people that is the whole package. But "the whole package" is personal, and some traders end up comparing Bloom against other bots — usually over fees, custody, which chains they care about, or simply wanting a different interface or referral setup. This is an honest look at what Bloom does well, the reasons you might shop around, and which alternatives are worth a serious comparison. Last updated 2026-06-18.

What Bloom is and what it does well

Bloom is a trading bot that runs in Telegram and also offers a Chrome extension. It started as a Solana-focused bot and now markets itself as multi-chain, with support for Ethereum, BSC, and Base alongside Solana. The headline pitch is speed and a smooth user experience, and on both counts it has a solid reputation among memecoin traders who care about getting in and out of fast-moving tokens quickly.

The feature set is broad. You get spot buy and sell by pasting a contract address, a sniper for catching new token launches and fresh liquidity, copy trading that mirrors a wallet you point it at (with buy filters and blacklists you can tune), and multiple limit orders plus automatic take-profit and stop-loss levels through its auto-orders system. AFK mode lets you pre-configure strategies so the bot keeps trading without you watching the screen. Bloom also leans into convenience touches like image or OCR-based sniping, where it can pull a token address out of a screenshot, and an in-bot bridge for moving funds between the chains it supports.

On custody, Bloom describes itself as non-custodial. It generates a wallet for you, stores the key in encrypted form, and shows you the private key once when the wallet is created — if you do not save it then, you cannot retrieve it later. That is a reasonable model for a Telegram bot, and the fact that it surfaces the key at all puts it ahead of bots that never let you see it. Bloom also offers MEV protection, using Jito processors when that option is enabled, to reduce the chance of your trades getting sandwiched. Taken together, Bloom is a capable, well-rounded bot, and for many traders there is no pressing reason to leave.

Why traders look at Bloom alternatives

Shopping around is not a knock on Bloom. It usually comes down to priorities that differ from what any single bot optimizes for. A few of the common ones:

• Fees and how discounts work. Bloom charges a 1% fee on buys and sells, reduced to 0.9% if you sign up through a referral link. That is competitive. But some traders prefer a flat rate that is the same for everyone with no referral mechanics attached, and others want to compare the all-in cost — fee plus priority tips plus any spread — rather than just the headline percentage. See how Solana trading bot fees actually work before assuming one number tells the whole story.
• Custody preferences. Bloom is non-custodial and lets you see your key once, which is good. Traders who care most about custody still differ on what they want: some want to verify exactly how a key is encrypted, some want full export at any time, and some are fine with the convenience trade-off. If this is your deciding factor, it is worth reading non-custodial versus custodial bots and running a security checklist against any bot you consider.
• Feature priorities. Bloom is broad, but you may only use a slice of it. If your strategy is mostly DCA and wallet tracking, a bot built around those will feel better than one built around sub-second sniping — and vice versa. The "best" bot is the one whose strengths line up with how you actually trade.
• Interface and revenue model. Some traders simply prefer a different UX, a different layout, or a referral structure that suits how they share. Bloom runs a multi-level referral program with cashback; not everyone wants that model, and that is a legitimate reason to look elsewhere.
• Single-chain focus. Bloom's multi-chain expansion is a plus if you trade Ethereum, BSC, or Base. If you only trade Solana, you may prefer a Solana-native bot that does one chain well rather than spreading across four.

None of these makes Bloom a bad choice. They are reasons your situation might point somewhere else.

How to choose by your priorities

Before comparing names, get clear on what actually matters to you. The trap is comparing bots feature-by-feature when most of them share the same core list — buy and sell, snipe, limit orders, copy trade, MEV protection. The real differences live in the details: the exact fee math, the custody model, how many wallets you can run, which chains are covered, and whether the interface fits your workflow.

A simple way to narrow it down: pick your top two priorities and let them filter. If cost is number one, compare all-in fees, not headline rates. If custody is number one, eliminate anything that will not at least let you export your key. If you run several strategies at once, prioritize a bot that supports multiple isolated wallets natively. If you trade more than one chain, weight multi-chain support heavily. Once you have your top two, the field shrinks fast, and the remaining choice is mostly about interface preference — which is best judged by actually trying a bot rather than reading about it.

A balanced rundown of Bloom alternatives

There are many Solana trading bots, and they fall into a few rough camps. Rather than crown a single winner, here is how to think about the field and where to dig deeper.

• Other fast Telegram-native bots. Bloom competes with a cluster of Telegram bots that share its speed-first, snipe-heavy approach — Trojan, Photon, BonkBot, and others. Each has its own fee structure, wallet model, and quirks. If you like Bloom's general shape but want to compare specific trade-offs, the dedicated breakdowns are the fastest path: Trojan alternatives, Photon alternatives, and BonkBot alternatives.
• Web-terminal and hybrid bots. Some traders prefer a browser terminal with charts and a richer screen over a chat interface. Bloom's Chrome extension nods in this direction, but if a full web terminal is what you want, that is a distinct category worth weighing against the Telegram-first bots.
• Self-custody, flat-fee Solana bots. If your priorities are keeping control of your keys and knowing exactly what each trade costs with no referral-dependent math, this camp is where to look. MoonHydra sits here, covered in the next section as one honest option among several.

If you want the wider view before committing, the roundup of the best Solana trading bot alternatives in 2026 and the broader best Solana trading bot guide lay out the full field side by side, so you are comparing apples to apples rather than reading one bot's marketing at a time.

What to verify before you switch

Whatever you move to, do the same diligence you would do on Bloom. A trading bot holds the keys to a wallet you fund, so the basics matter more than the feature list:

1. Custody and key handling. Confirm whether the bot is non-custodial, whether you can export your private key, and how that key is stored. "Non-custodial" is a spectrum, and you want to know where a given bot sits on it.
2. The real cost per trade. Read the fee, then check for priority tips, bundle costs, and any spread. Two bots that both advertise 1% can cost noticeably different amounts in practice.
3. Track record and transparency. Look for how long the bot has run, whether there is a clear team or documentation, and how it handles outages. Do not rely on hype or screenshots.
4. Feature fit. Make sure the bot does the specific things you do — DCA, copy trading, limit orders, multiple wallets — well, not just that it lists them.

A bot that is honest about all four is a safer home than one with a flashier feature grid. If you want a structured way to run these checks, the security checklist walks through each one.

How MoonHydra fits

MoonHydra is one option in the self-custody, flat-fee camp, and it is worth a fair comparison if those are your priorities — not because it is "better than Bloom," but because it makes a few specific trade-offs differently. It is non-custodial: your private keys are encrypted with AES-256-GCM, and MoonHydra never takes custody of your funds. It uses no custom smart contracts and routes trades through Jupiter for Solana-wide liquidity, so you are not trusting bespoke on-chain code with your money.

On cost, MoonHydra charges a flat 1% per trade on both buys and sells, with no subscription and no referral-dependent rate — the number is the same whether or not you came through a link. Feature-wise it covers what an active trader expects: buy and sell by contract address, limit orders, take-profit and stop-loss, copy trading, DCA, and wallet tracking. Its Hydra Head sub-wallets let you run multiple isolated wallets under one account, which suits traders who compartmentalize strategies. There is an optional RugCheck screen, off by default so it never gets in your way unless you turn it on, and a referral program paying 30% and 10% across two tiers.

Where MoonHydra differs from Bloom most clearly: it is Solana-native rather than multi-chain, so if you actively trade Ethereum, BSC, or Base, Bloom's wider reach is a genuine advantage and MoonHydra is not trying to match it. MoonHydra is also not open source and is not something you self-host. The honest framing is that MoonHydra is a good fit if your priorities are self-custody, a single transparent fee, and Solana focus — and if multi-chain or a particular Bloom feature matters more to you, Bloom may be the better call. Compare both against your own list rather than taking either side's word for it.

Bottom line

Bloom is a fast, well-built Solana trading bot with a deep feature set, a clean interface, a non-custodial design, and a competitive 1% fee that drops to 0.9% through a referral. For many traders it is more than enough, and there is no reason to switch just because alternatives exist. You look elsewhere when your priorities diverge — when you want a flat fee with no referral mechanics, stricter custody guarantees, native multi-wallet support, a different interface, or a focus on a chain Bloom does not lead on. Decide what your top two priorities are, compare the real details rather than the marketing, and pick the bot that fits how you actually trade.

Next: read the best Solana trading bot alternatives in 2026, weigh non-custodial versus custodial bots, and check the real cost of bot fees before you decide. If a self-custody, flat-1%, Solana-native option fits your priorities, you can try MoonHydra at t.me/moonhydrabot.